Outcomes
- Standardize quality with role, task, context, constraints, and format
- Turn AI drafts into shippable assets with verification checklists
- Build a reusable library teammates can fork for similar work
- Reduce rewrite cycles by catching weak prompts before generation
Audience
- Students building portfolio-ready AI workflows
- Freelancers packaging prompts into client deliverables
- Founders and operators who own UI/UX Critique outcomes
- Marketers and creators shipping weekly content systems
What this UI/UX Critique AI Prompts pack is for
UI/UX Critique AI Prompts is a complete, practice-first field guide for people who want AI help that actually ships. Instead of one vague “write me something” instruction, this pack teaches a repeatable structure: role, task, context, constraints, and output format — the same method we teach inside Technical House Prompt Lab, Learn tracks, and knowledge archive.
Teams lose hours when prompts are underspecified. Models invent metrics, skip edge cases, and produce tone-deaf copy. This pack is built around UI/UX Critique so every example stays grounded in the work you do: A deep prompt pack for UI/UX Critique with ready-to-use workflows, examples, and quality rubrics.
You will find long explanations, fourteen production prompts, verification habits, failure modes, and FAQs. Treat it like a course chapter you can reopen whenever you start a new UI/UX Critique sprint. Pair it with our Ship Checklist before you publish anything ad-sensitive or client-facing.
Technical House sits at the intersection of web development and AI learning. That means these prompts respect engineering reality: incomplete tickets, messy brand guidelines, SEO constraints, accessibility, and the need to verify model output before it reaches production or AdSense-reviewed pages.
Who should use this pack
If your calendar includes UI/UX Critique work more than once a month, this pack pays for itself in saved revisions. It is written for practitioners, not spectators — people who will paste prompts, edit outputs, and keep a personal library of winners.
Beginners can follow the starter workflow section line by line. Advanced users can jump to the later prompts, swap roles, and build chained workflows (research → outline → draft → critique → final). Agency leads can drop prompts into SOPs so juniors stop improvising from scratch.
- Students building portfolio-ready AI workflows
- Freelancers packaging prompts into client deliverables
- Founders and operators who own UI/UX Critique outcomes
- Marketers and creators shipping weekly content systems
Outcomes you can expect
After working through this pack, you should be able to brief an AI assistant the way you would brief a sharp contractor: clear deliverable, constraints, and acceptance tests. The goal is not longer chats — it is fewer chats with better artifacts.
- Standardize quality with role, task, context, constraints, and format
- Turn AI drafts into shippable assets with verification checklists
- Build a reusable library teammates can fork for similar work
- Reduce rewrite cycles by catching weak prompts before generation
How to run prompts the Technical House way
Step 1 — Collect context. Brand voice notes, audience, offer, URL, metrics, screenshots, and constraints belong in the Context block. If you skip this, the model fills gaps with fiction.
Step 2 — Score the prompt. Paste into Prompt Lab or Prompt Duel. Aim for a high score on role, task, context, constraints, and format before you burn API credits or attention.
Step 3 — Generate once, then critique. Run a second prompt that reviews severity (blocker / major / nit) instead of endlessly regenerating from zero.
Step 4 — Verify in the real world. Click the links, run the code, read the script aloud, check mobile layout, or validate SEO fields. AI does not replace QA.
Step 5 — Save winners. Store the exact prompt that worked in Notion, your Snippet Library, or a private repo. Model updates happen — golden prompts are your regression suite.
- Never paste secrets, API keys, or private customer PII into public chat tools.
- Prefer smaller chained prompts over one mega-prompt that tries to do everything.
- Keep a human gate before client delivery or production deploys.
- Update packs when platforms change (Shopify, Instagram, YouTube, Next.js APIs).
Ready-to-use prompt library (UI/UX Critique)
Below are eighteen prompts tailored to UI/UX Critique AI Prompts. Each includes a full system-style brief you can copy. Replace bracketed assumptions with your real details. If a field is unknown, keep the “ask clarifying questions” constraint active.
Use Prompt Duel to compare two variants when quality is uneven. Use Ship Checklist before publishing pages that need to survive AdSense or client review. Use the knowledge archive when you need deeper theory behind a tactic.
Each prompt is intentionally long. Short prompts feel fast but produce generic work. These briefs are written so a capable model can execute without a second meeting — the same standard we use when teaching prompt engineering on Technical House.
01Rewrite — UI/UX Critique (#1)
You are a Next.js product engineer. Task: Rewrite UI/UX Critique deliverables that map to measurable business or shipping outcomes. Context: - Pack: UI/UX Critique AI Prompts - Category: Web Development - User goal: ship usable UI/UX Critique assets this week, not generic advice - Stack / channel assumptions: modern web + AI tools (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Cursor, or similar) - Audience literacy: mixed — experts and ambitious beginners Constraints: - Output must be paste-ready into Docs or Notion. - Include at least one weak vs strong example inside your answer - Tie recommendations back to UI/UX Critique - Never invent customer quotes or fake case studies Output format: Script with timestamps / beat markers After the main deliverable, add a short “How to verify” section (3 bullets).
Paste into your AI tool after filling missing context (brand, audience, offer, metrics). Score the prompt in Technical House Prompt Lab before you run a big batch.
02Compress — UI/UX Critique (#2)
You are a design systems lead. Task: Compress the UI/UX Critique workflow for a web development team. Context: - Pack: UI/UX Critique AI Prompts - Category: Web Development - User goal: ship usable UI/UX Critique assets this week, not generic advice - Stack / channel assumptions: modern web + AI tools (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Cursor, or similar) - Audience literacy: mixed — experts and ambitious beginners Constraints: - Prefer bullet steps the user can execute today. - Include at least one weak vs strong example inside your answer - Tie recommendations back to UI/UX Critique - Never invent customer quotes or fake case studies Output format: Markdown with H2/H3 headings After the main deliverable, add a short “How to verify” section (3 bullets).
Paste into your AI tool after filling missing context (brand, audience, offer, metrics). Score the prompt in Technical House Prompt Lab before you run a big batch.
03Score — UI/UX Critique (#3)
You are a accessibility auditor. Task: Score a realistic UI/UX Critique scenario with incomplete inputs. Context: - Pack: UI/UX Critique AI Prompts - Category: Web Development - User goal: ship usable UI/UX Critique assets this week, not generic advice - Stack / channel assumptions: modern web + AI tools (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Cursor, or similar) - Audience literacy: mixed — experts and ambitious beginners Constraints: - Match a professional but human brand voice — no hype spam. - Include at least one weak vs strong example inside your answer - Tie recommendations back to UI/UX Critique - Never invent customer quotes or fake case studies Output format: JSON fields the user can copy into a CMS After the main deliverable, add a short “How to verify” section (3 bullets).
Paste into your AI tool after filling missing context (brand, audience, offer, metrics). Score the prompt in Technical House Prompt Lab before you run a big batch.
04Turn research notes into — UI/UX Critique (#4)
You are a staff frontend engineer. Task: Turn research notes into UI/UX Critique quality standards aligned with Technical House teaching methods. Context: - Pack: UI/UX Critique AI Prompts - Category: Web Development - User goal: ship usable UI/UX Critique assets this week, not generic advice - Stack / channel assumptions: modern web + AI tools (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Cursor, or similar) - Audience literacy: mixed — experts and ambitious beginners Constraints: - Call out risks, edge cases, and what to verify manually. - Include at least one weak vs strong example inside your answer - Tie recommendations back to UI/UX Critique - Never invent customer quotes or fake case studies Output format: Email sequence: subject + body + send delay After the main deliverable, add a short “How to verify” section (3 bullets).
Paste into your AI tool after filling missing context (brand, audience, offer, metrics). Score the prompt in Technical House Prompt Lab before you run a big batch.
05Rewrite — UI/UX Critique (#5)
You are a Next.js product engineer. Task: Rewrite an advanced UI/UX Critique system that juniors can run without guessing. Context: - Pack: UI/UX Critique AI Prompts - Category: Web Development - User goal: ship usable UI/UX Critique assets this week, not generic advice - Stack / channel assumptions: modern web + AI tools (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Cursor, or similar) - Audience literacy: mixed — experts and ambitious beginners Constraints: - Keep reading level clear for busy operators (Grade 8–10). - Include at least one weak vs strong example inside your answer - Tie recommendations back to UI/UX Critique - Never invent customer quotes or fake case studies Output format: Numbered playbook with time estimates After the main deliverable, add a short “How to verify” section (3 bullets).
Paste into your AI tool after filling missing context (brand, audience, offer, metrics). Score the prompt in Technical House Prompt Lab before you run a big batch.
06Compress — UI/UX Critique (#6)
You are a design systems lead. Task: Compress UI/UX Critique deliverables that map to measurable business or shipping outcomes. Context: - Pack: UI/UX Critique AI Prompts - Category: Web Development - User goal: ship usable UI/UX Critique assets this week, not generic advice - Stack / channel assumptions: modern web + AI tools (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Cursor, or similar) - Audience literacy: mixed — experts and ambitious beginners Constraints: - If context is missing, ask up to 5 clarifying questions first. - Include at least one weak vs strong example inside your answer - Tie recommendations back to UI/UX Critique - Never invent customer quotes or fake case studies Output format: Checklist with acceptance criteria After the main deliverable, add a short “How to verify” section (3 bullets).
Paste into your AI tool after filling missing context (brand, audience, offer, metrics). Score the prompt in Technical House Prompt Lab before you run a big batch.
07Score — UI/UX Critique (#7)
You are a accessibility auditor. Task: Score the UI/UX Critique workflow for a web development team. Context: - Pack: UI/UX Critique AI Prompts - Category: Web Development - User goal: ship usable UI/UX Critique assets this week, not generic advice - Stack / channel assumptions: modern web + AI tools (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Cursor, or similar) - Audience literacy: mixed — experts and ambitious beginners Constraints: - Avoid fluff intros; start with the deliverable. - Include at least one weak vs strong example inside your answer - Tie recommendations back to UI/UX Critique - Never invent customer quotes or fake case studies Output format: Prompt + expected output example pairs After the main deliverable, add a short “How to verify” section (3 bullets).
Paste into your AI tool after filling missing context (brand, audience, offer, metrics). Score the prompt in Technical House Prompt Lab before you run a big batch.
08Turn research notes into — UI/UX Critique (#8)
You are a staff frontend engineer. Task: Turn research notes into a realistic UI/UX Critique scenario with incomplete inputs. Context: - Pack: UI/UX Critique AI Prompts - Category: Web Development - User goal: ship usable UI/UX Critique assets this week, not generic advice - Stack / channel assumptions: modern web + AI tools (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Cursor, or similar) - Audience literacy: mixed — experts and ambitious beginners Constraints: - Do not invent statistics. Mark assumptions clearly. - Include at least one weak vs strong example inside your answer - Tie recommendations back to UI/UX Critique - Never invent customer quotes or fake case studies Output format: Table: step | owner | tool | success metric After the main deliverable, add a short “How to verify” section (3 bullets).
Paste into your AI tool after filling missing context (brand, audience, offer, metrics). Score the prompt in Technical House Prompt Lab before you run a big batch.
09Rewrite — UI/UX Critique (#9)
You are a Next.js product engineer. Task: Rewrite UI/UX Critique quality standards aligned with Technical House teaching methods. Context: - Pack: UI/UX Critique AI Prompts - Category: Web Development - User goal: ship usable UI/UX Critique assets this week, not generic advice - Stack / channel assumptions: modern web + AI tools (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Cursor, or similar) - Audience literacy: mixed — experts and ambitious beginners Constraints: - Output must be paste-ready into Docs or Notion. - Include at least one weak vs strong example inside your answer - Tie recommendations back to UI/UX Critique - Never invent customer quotes or fake case studies Output format: Script with timestamps / beat markers After the main deliverable, add a short “How to verify” section (3 bullets).
Paste into your AI tool after filling missing context (brand, audience, offer, metrics). Score the prompt in Technical House Prompt Lab before you run a big batch.
10Compress — UI/UX Critique (#10)
You are a design systems lead. Task: Compress an advanced UI/UX Critique system that juniors can run without guessing. Context: - Pack: UI/UX Critique AI Prompts - Category: Web Development - User goal: ship usable UI/UX Critique assets this week, not generic advice - Stack / channel assumptions: modern web + AI tools (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Cursor, or similar) - Audience literacy: mixed — experts and ambitious beginners Constraints: - Prefer bullet steps the user can execute today. - Include at least one weak vs strong example inside your answer - Tie recommendations back to UI/UX Critique - Never invent customer quotes or fake case studies Output format: Markdown with H2/H3 headings After the main deliverable, add a short “How to verify” section (3 bullets).
Paste into your AI tool after filling missing context (brand, audience, offer, metrics). Score the prompt in Technical House Prompt Lab before you run a big batch.
11Score — UI/UX Critique (#11)
You are a accessibility auditor. Task: Score UI/UX Critique deliverables that map to measurable business or shipping outcomes. Context: - Pack: UI/UX Critique AI Prompts - Category: Web Development - User goal: ship usable UI/UX Critique assets this week, not generic advice - Stack / channel assumptions: modern web + AI tools (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Cursor, or similar) - Audience literacy: mixed — experts and ambitious beginners Constraints: - Match a professional but human brand voice — no hype spam. - Include at least one weak vs strong example inside your answer - Tie recommendations back to UI/UX Critique - Never invent customer quotes or fake case studies Output format: JSON fields the user can copy into a CMS After the main deliverable, add a short “How to verify” section (3 bullets).
Paste into your AI tool after filling missing context (brand, audience, offer, metrics). Score the prompt in Technical House Prompt Lab before you run a big batch.
12Turn research notes into — UI/UX Critique (#12)
You are a staff frontend engineer. Task: Turn research notes into the UI/UX Critique workflow for a web development team. Context: - Pack: UI/UX Critique AI Prompts - Category: Web Development - User goal: ship usable UI/UX Critique assets this week, not generic advice - Stack / channel assumptions: modern web + AI tools (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Cursor, or similar) - Audience literacy: mixed — experts and ambitious beginners Constraints: - Call out risks, edge cases, and what to verify manually. - Include at least one weak vs strong example inside your answer - Tie recommendations back to UI/UX Critique - Never invent customer quotes or fake case studies Output format: Email sequence: subject + body + send delay After the main deliverable, add a short “How to verify” section (3 bullets).
Paste into your AI tool after filling missing context (brand, audience, offer, metrics). Score the prompt in Technical House Prompt Lab before you run a big batch.
13Rewrite — UI/UX Critique (#13)
You are a Next.js product engineer. Task: Rewrite a realistic UI/UX Critique scenario with incomplete inputs. Context: - Pack: UI/UX Critique AI Prompts - Category: Web Development - User goal: ship usable UI/UX Critique assets this week, not generic advice - Stack / channel assumptions: modern web + AI tools (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Cursor, or similar) - Audience literacy: mixed — experts and ambitious beginners Constraints: - Keep reading level clear for busy operators (Grade 8–10). - Include at least one weak vs strong example inside your answer - Tie recommendations back to UI/UX Critique - Never invent customer quotes or fake case studies Output format: Numbered playbook with time estimates After the main deliverable, add a short “How to verify” section (3 bullets).
Paste into your AI tool after filling missing context (brand, audience, offer, metrics). Score the prompt in Technical House Prompt Lab before you run a big batch.
14Compress — UI/UX Critique (#14)
You are a design systems lead. Task: Compress UI/UX Critique quality standards aligned with Technical House teaching methods. Context: - Pack: UI/UX Critique AI Prompts - Category: Web Development - User goal: ship usable UI/UX Critique assets this week, not generic advice - Stack / channel assumptions: modern web + AI tools (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Cursor, or similar) - Audience literacy: mixed — experts and ambitious beginners Constraints: - If context is missing, ask up to 5 clarifying questions first. - Include at least one weak vs strong example inside your answer - Tie recommendations back to UI/UX Critique - Never invent customer quotes or fake case studies Output format: Checklist with acceptance criteria After the main deliverable, add a short “How to verify” section (3 bullets).
Paste into your AI tool after filling missing context (brand, audience, offer, metrics). Score the prompt in Technical House Prompt Lab before you run a big batch.
15Score — UI/UX Critique (#15)
You are a accessibility auditor. Task: Score an advanced UI/UX Critique system that juniors can run without guessing. Context: - Pack: UI/UX Critique AI Prompts - Category: Web Development - User goal: ship usable UI/UX Critique assets this week, not generic advice - Stack / channel assumptions: modern web + AI tools (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Cursor, or similar) - Audience literacy: mixed — experts and ambitious beginners Constraints: - Avoid fluff intros; start with the deliverable. - Include at least one weak vs strong example inside your answer - Tie recommendations back to UI/UX Critique - Never invent customer quotes or fake case studies Output format: Prompt + expected output example pairs After the main deliverable, add a short “How to verify” section (3 bullets).
Paste into your AI tool after filling missing context (brand, audience, offer, metrics). Score the prompt in Technical House Prompt Lab before you run a big batch.
16Turn research notes into — UI/UX Critique (#16)
You are a staff frontend engineer. Task: Turn research notes into UI/UX Critique deliverables that map to measurable business or shipping outcomes. Context: - Pack: UI/UX Critique AI Prompts - Category: Web Development - User goal: ship usable UI/UX Critique assets this week, not generic advice - Stack / channel assumptions: modern web + AI tools (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Cursor, or similar) - Audience literacy: mixed — experts and ambitious beginners Constraints: - Do not invent statistics. Mark assumptions clearly. - Include at least one weak vs strong example inside your answer - Tie recommendations back to UI/UX Critique - Never invent customer quotes or fake case studies Output format: Table: step | owner | tool | success metric After the main deliverable, add a short “How to verify” section (3 bullets).
Paste into your AI tool after filling missing context (brand, audience, offer, metrics). Score the prompt in Technical House Prompt Lab before you run a big batch.
17Rewrite — UI/UX Critique (#17)
You are a Next.js product engineer. Task: Rewrite the UI/UX Critique workflow for a web development team. Context: - Pack: UI/UX Critique AI Prompts - Category: Web Development - User goal: ship usable UI/UX Critique assets this week, not generic advice - Stack / channel assumptions: modern web + AI tools (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Cursor, or similar) - Audience literacy: mixed — experts and ambitious beginners Constraints: - Output must be paste-ready into Docs or Notion. - Include at least one weak vs strong example inside your answer - Tie recommendations back to UI/UX Critique - Never invent customer quotes or fake case studies Output format: Script with timestamps / beat markers After the main deliverable, add a short “How to verify” section (3 bullets).
Paste into your AI tool after filling missing context (brand, audience, offer, metrics). Score the prompt in Technical House Prompt Lab before you run a big batch.
18Compress — UI/UX Critique (#18)
You are a design systems lead. Task: Compress a realistic UI/UX Critique scenario with incomplete inputs. Context: - Pack: UI/UX Critique AI Prompts - Category: Web Development - User goal: ship usable UI/UX Critique assets this week, not generic advice - Stack / channel assumptions: modern web + AI tools (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Cursor, or similar) - Audience literacy: mixed — experts and ambitious beginners Constraints: - Prefer bullet steps the user can execute today. - Include at least one weak vs strong example inside your answer - Tie recommendations back to UI/UX Critique - Never invent customer quotes or fake case studies Output format: Markdown with H2/H3 headings After the main deliverable, add a short “How to verify” section (3 bullets).
Paste into your AI tool after filling missing context (brand, audience, offer, metrics). Score the prompt in Technical House Prompt Lab before you run a big batch.
End-to-end workflow for UI/UX Critique
Morning: define the single outcome for the day (one landing section, one email, one script, one PR brief). Afternoon: generate with two prompts max — draft then critique. Evening: verify and ship a thin vertical slice.
Weekly: cluster related UI/UX Critique assets into a series so internal links and learning compound. Monthly: prune weak prompts from your library and promote the ones that repeatedly score well.
For web development packs, connect outputs to real repos: open a branch, apply the patch, run tests. For marketing packs, connect outputs to a calendar with UTM conventions. For automation packs, document the trigger, the tools, and the failure path.
Autopilot business packs should still include human review on pricing, legal claims, and accessibility. “Autopilot” means standardized prompts and SOPs — not abandoning judgment.
- Map each prompt to an owner and a tool (ChatGPT, Claude, Cursor, Notion, Shopify, etc.).
- Track a simple metric: time-to-first-draft, revision count, or conversion proxy.
- Keep a failure journal when AI wastes an hour — patterns become training for your team.
- Link related Technical House resources: Learn tracks, cheat sheets, glossary terms.
Common failure modes (and fixes)
Failure: generic output. Fix: add brand facts, banned phrases, and a strong example. Failure: hallucinated features. Fix: paste the real feature list and forbid invention. Failure: tone mismatch. Fix: include three sample sentences in your voice.
Failure: endless regeneration. Fix: switch to a critique prompt with a rubric. Failure: unsafe code or XSS-prone HTML. Fix: demand security notes and run human review. Failure: thin SEO pages. Fix: require original examples, FAQs, and internal links — the same substance bar we apply across Technical House.
Failure: over-automation. Fix: keep approvals for money, legal, and public posts. Automation should accelerate drafts, not auto-publish nonsense.
Advanced tactics for Web Development
Build prompt chains: research synthesis → outline → draft → severe critique → final polish. Persist each stage as an artifact so you can restart mid-pipeline.
Maintain an eval set: five golden inputs with expected traits. When a model update lands, re-run the set before trusting production workflows.
For coding packs, insist on minimal diffs and tests. For ecommerce packs, insist on offer clarity and policy accuracy. For YouTube/Instagram packs, insist on hooks in the first three seconds and a single CTA.
Cross-link this pack with neighboring categories in the Prompt Packs library so readers discover adjacent systems — for example, pairing web development prompts with SEO cluster prompts when launching a learning site.
Quality rubric you can reuse
Score every UI/UX Critique deliverable 1–5 on: clarity, specificity, originality, actionability, and risk awareness. Reject anything under 18/25 for client or production use.
Bonus points for including verification steps, accessibility notes, and measurement plans. Penalty for unsupported claims, keyword stuffing, or ignoring the user’s actual constraints.
- Clarity: would a junior execute without a meeting?
- Specificity: are inputs and outputs named?
- Originality: does it add examples unique to this brand/problem?
- Actionability: are next steps time-boxed?
- Risk: are legal, security, and brand risks flagged?
How this connects to the rest of Technical House
Use Learn → Prompt Engineering for the foundational method. Use Tools for Prompt Lab, Prompt Duel, Ship Checklist, and Snippets. Use the Knowledge Archive for deeper essays on SEO-safe content, AI pair programming, and shipping checklists.
UI/UX Critique AI Prompts is one node in a larger system: we want the site to feel like a continuously updated teaching product — interactive labs plus long-form packs — not a thin list of blog titles.
FAQ
Is UI/UX Critique AI Prompts free to use?
Yes. The pack is published on Technical House for learning and practical use. You still need access to an AI tool of your choice to run the prompts.
Do these prompts work with ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Cursor?
Yes. The structure is model-agnostic. Adjust length and formatting slightly per tool, but keep role, task, context, constraints, and format intact.
How is this different from a short prompt listicle?
Each pack is a long-form guide with workflows, failure modes, rubrics, and many fully written prompts — designed to clear thin-content bars and actually teach a system.
Can agencies white-label these workflows?
You may adapt prompts for client delivery. Do not scrape and republish the entire pack as your own article. Link back if you reference Technical House methods publicly.
How do I keep outputs AdSense-safe or client-safe?
Require original examples, verify claims, avoid doorway-page templates, and run the Ship Checklist. Substance and usefulness beat keyword volume.
What should I do after finishing this pack?
Save your best prompts, ship one real asset this week, then explore a related pack in the same category or move into the Learn archive for deeper theory.